esen
info@cadiztaxitours.com
(+34) 627042073
(+34) 687944272

Are you able to submit a paper to a scholarly, peer-reviewed journal without PhD and obtain it accepted?

Are you able to submit a paper to a scholarly, peer-reviewed journal without PhD and obtain it accepted?

Are you able to submit a paper to a scholarly, peer-reviewed log without PhD? More especially, just just what is the smallest amount skills that will give one the chance regarding the paper being posted in a peer-reviewed educational medium?

11 Responses 11

Publishing a scholastic paper for book (and possibly setting it up accepted) will not need any skills whatsoever. You certainly do not need a PhD; you never also must have visited university. There are not any academic, work, or account needs after all.

That is not to say this’s an easy task to obtain a paper accepted without any formal training in the field. Learning just how to compose a compelling paper is much simpler when you yourself have a mentor to provide guidance. Nonetheless, then your lack of a PhD will not be held against you if you can figure out how to do it without a PhD.

Yes, it is possible to obtain a paper posted with no a PhD: PhD pupils get it done on a regular basis. Submitted documents are expected to be assessed in accordance with whatever they state, maybe perhaps perhaps not who stated it.

Yes. In practice, graduate research is just one of the primary means individuals achieve the relevant skills to publish this kind of paper, however a Ph.D. is certainly not a requirement. Skills could be a range of the journal that is individual but I’m not sure of every that have an insurance policy of requiring level qualifications from submitters. As an example, very often graduate or students that are undergraduate such papers.

Being an extreme instance, check out groundbreaking pre- or no-PhD discoveries:

Henri Lebesgue developed their famous integration theory as a new school that is high in 1902.

Space–time block coding, a theoretical concept that has become important to cordless communications, ended up being devised in 1997 by Siavash Alamouti as being an exercising engineer having a master’s level.

The AKS primality test ended up being caused by 2002 research that is undergraduate the Indian Institute of Technology.

It is clear that such contributions warrant a book aside from the writer’s status.

It is not only feasible however it is a necessity at numerous universities that your Ph.D thesis be entirely centered on peer reviewed documents.

Another problem this is actually the known proven fact that in science just the research outcomes should make a difference, maybe not who’s presenting those outcomes. If Prof. Dr. X has submitted a paper this is certainly discovered become wanting, then it ought to be refused. Then that paper should be accepted if John Doe Y who dropped out of primary school, submits a paper containing ground breaking results. Then that would mean that science is not conducted in an independent way if this were not (in principle) true. Arguments from authority, as opposed to those on the basis of the merits would for some degree corrupt the process that is scientific.

I will be a little more skeptical as compared to most of the responses.

The reason that is first more profane: you can find journals with additional reputation plus some with less reputation. The journals with increased reputation do have more visitors and if you’re posted in this paper, it’s going to foster your reputation. The direct impact is the fact that everybody else attempts to get posted into the many prestigous journals. Therefore the editors have swamped with documents and must select by concern. If two email address details are similarly impressive, the likelihood that the greater amount of experienced and scientist that is reputable be posted is quite high.

Therefore the approach that is standard to get hold of the journals in descending purchase of reputation and request book. Therefore, yes, you may be published, however it is most likely that you have to pick a journal with less reputation and therefore implies that your outcomes could be ignored.

That get us towards the 2nd issue: when you yourself have an extraordinary outcome, then your editors will scan your paper more closely. Uncommon language (there was a certain can i pay someone to write my paper lingo you employ in documents), strange structure (Word rather Latex) and a remarkable derive from a person who is certainly not understood before raises a red security. If Anonymous Mathematica claims that “your absence of the PhD won’t be held against you”, I quickly say, nope, this isn’t remotely real. It is extremely most most likely which you along with your paper are not scrutinized any longer and rejected. In the event that you decide to try to fight your choice, the label crackpot is attached with you faster than it is possible to inhale. Which means you needs to be acutely careful to create a paper as amateur. Specially because you will find journals that are therefore. problematic that publishing here will damage your reputation.

The arXiv makes use of an recommendation system to guarantee that only people from universities and research centers can submit documents; other folks are locked away.

It is unfortunately necessary to contact someone from a university etc. which helps you to get through the barrier if you really have an impressive result: In both cases, arXiv and respectable journal.

Therefore, principially yes, but you can find obstacles. Try not to underestimate the difficulty.

IMPROVE: some given information ahead of time. The standing of a log is calculated because of the effect factor and since 2005 additionally because of the h-index. For 2013 Nature has ranking 7 when you look at the effect factor with 38.6 and leads the h-index with 829. Technology has rank 20 (it is preceded by 9 (!) Nature specializations) and it is 2nd in the h-index with 801. Therefore pretty crucial journals. Nature provides a synopsis within the book procedure plus in reality the rejection price steadily increased from 89% to 92per cent that we would phone “swamping”.

Corvus now claims that my analysis is glaringly wrong and provides the reason that other journals except Nature and Science don’t have the requirement to select between documents, if i’ve recognized him appropriate.
Corvus, its your declare that other high-reputable journals both by h-index and impact element don’t have the issue with deciding on a paper and consequently high rejection rates ? Do you really stay by the claim ? If my info is outdated or simply just incorrect, I quickly will retract it, but We will research it. Glaringly incorrect, yes or no ?

JeffE, would you agree totally that being of user for the Computer Science Department in Illinois (which incidentally built the ORDVAC and ILLIAC and tend to be currently in charge of the LLVM Compiler Infrastructure) with a tremendously long tradition and a very very own ACM chapter might offer a paper some suggestion ?